<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why OpenWack HTML will not validate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.openwack.org/blog/2009/04/why-openwack-html-will-not-validate.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.openwack.org/blog/2009/04/why-openwack-html-will-not-validate.html</link>
	<description>The best free community software highlighted</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:29:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: One Month Summary &#124; WackWorld Expo</title>
		<link>http://www.openwack.org/blog/2009/04/why-openwack-html-will-not-validate.html/comment-page-1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>One Month Summary &#124; WackWorld Expo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.openwack.org/blog/?p=75#comment-37</guid>
		<description>[...] Pages validation for OpenWack software is now officially claimed to be abandoned. I like the idea of testing sites in all browsers and if they work I don&#8217;t think having w3c badges is important. I think that Emil &amp; Co are on the right track here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pages validation for OpenWack software is now officially claimed to be abandoned. I like the idea of testing sites in all browsers and if they work I don&#8217;t think having w3c badges is important. I think that Emil &amp; Co are on the right track here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
